Guidelines for Naming Conventions


Government Social Media

home > library > naming conventions

 

Draft Guidelines for Social Media Naming Conventions

 

 

The Social Media Subcouncil is currently requesting feedback on the draft Guidelines for Social Media Naming Conventions.

 

Please review our draft guidelines and provide your input, either by commenting on the page, or directly editing the guidelines. Request access to the wiki.

 

Abstract:

Government organizations adopting elements of social media must consider many factors when establishing accounts on social media services and when developing in-house social media products.  These guidelines provide recommendations for government agencies to ensure trust and integrity are communicated and to ensure brand consistency is achieved.

 

Guideline 1: Account Names - Branding

 

When establishing an account on an existing social network (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc.), the account name should reflect the agency's name and convey an official status, therefore leveraging the brand attributes of authenticity and trust.

 

Considerations:

 

Recommendation: Convey authenticity to your audience

 

Recommendation: Secure your brand

 

 

Guideline 2: Account Names - Consistency

 

Naming consistency across social networks is recommended for branding and name recognition.

 

Considerations:

 

Examples of Name Variations Due to Naming Contraints: Library of Congress
Service Account Name
Website loc.gov www.loc.gov
Flickr library_of_congress (www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress)
YouTube libraryofcongress  and uscensusbureau   (in development)
Twitter

librarycongress  www.twitter.com/librarycongress

 

 

Recommendations: 

 

Guideline 3: Account Names - "Personalized" accounts created for work-related purposes vs. master accounts representing your agency

 

Considerations: 

 

Recommendations: Name accounts appropriately depending on the nature of the account

 

Related Information: URLs and File Names

 

The URL for government agencies helps to convey authenticity and trust of the content it contains by use of the domain suffix .gov or .mil.  

  

Examples of existing account names

(Note: Not all of the account names listed adhere to these guidelines)

 

Definitions 

 

For more detailed explination of domain names, subdomains, etc., see: "Understanding and Decoding URLs" Johns Hopkins University. http://www.library.jhu.edu/researchhelp/general/evaluating/url.html

 

References

 

"Users are used to trusting websites based on the name of the site, or the name of the company in

the URL. If they trust the URL, they will interact freely with the website. With many Web 2.0

technologies there is either no comparable context that the user can base trust on, or if there is a

context, it can be misleading." from Position Paper: Web 2.0 Security and Privacy, Decemer 2008. http://www.enisa.europa.eu/doc/pdf/deliverables/enisa_pp_web2.pdf:

 

Many higher education institutions provide guidance on how to determine if a web site is trustworthy or questionable.

"Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask."  UC Berkeley Library,

 http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html

5 criteria for evaluating Web pages."  Cornell University Library, http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/webcrit.html 

"Evaluating Web Content/Social Networking Sites." Johns Hopkins University,

http://www.library.jhu.edu/researchhelp/general/evaluating/